1) this isn't what I think of as a watermark. To me a watermark is what one
sees when you hold a US $50.00 note up and see Grant.
2) they are not putting a copyright symbols on the photo so they are not
getting any copyright protection. They are just saying they are the source of
this item. It really isn't even a derivative work as it is just a copy of an
existing work.
3) the copyright holder can sue them for $ if they didn't receive
permission to publish them from the copyright holder.
Roy
In a message dated 8/20/2014 12:33:31 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
elson@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Here is a webpage that shows photos in Museo de Oro in my place: |