Re: Copyright, an answer to revenge porn

[James Schenken <jds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Randy,

That doesn't make sense.  If I give you a book or video, for example, and you put a copy up on the internet not for financial gain, are you claiming no infringement has taken place?

On Nov 15, 2013, at 10:11 AM, Randy Little <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

No damages to use a gift in a not for profit showing.   If you give me a picture I can unless in the license told other wise display that image as I see fit as long as I am not selling it as by presenting me with the image you are granting me personal use.     that would be like saying I give you a painting  and you can only hang it  where I decide AFTER the fact.   ( not that revenge porn is a good thing in any way but copyright isn't going to help unless you send a license saying this can NEVER be displayed.   Which wouldn't hold up in court. 

Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06 AM, <PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx> wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/15/revenge-porn-laws_n_4280668.html

 

If a person takes pictures of themselves they should copyright them thru the US Govt. so if they end up as revenge porn they get the statutory damages