On Aug 18, 2013, at 2:04 AM, Randy Little wrote: This and other comments bring to light the inherent problem with digital which no manufacturer has been able to overcome through technology: it is still too contrasty to provide much of a challenge to film. Perhaps the digital backs costing above $50k do it fine, but the small sensors made without the application of ‘fat’ sensors are too imperfect for most artists. Film would have given a different result here. Art Faul The Artist Formerly Known as Prints ------ Art for Cars: art4carz.com Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com Greens: http://www.inkjetprince.com Camera Works - The Washington Post . |
