I would say if thats the case then the front rocks need to be burned in more to make then less bright. My eyes don't want to leave the rocks. Darker rocks brighter other stuff rocks less important while staying part of the composition.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 17, 2013, at 9:17 PM, Robert J McCulloch wrote:Folks, the rocks are deliberate, everybody does just the lighthouse, and thanks for looking, Bob.
Well of course they are. It’s true, you could have shot with a longer lens, but you may not be able to get one for your phone. Even if this was shot with a real camera with no phone in it, you still might not have had the lens with you.This is my kind of shot. The ocean goes from front right to back left and draws the eye through the frame as it should with the rocks providing a penned in feeling for the ocean and the lighthouse nicely off center. If you had put it in the middle like some people who contribute to the gallery, I would be calling out the National Guard. My only complaint is that it was shot with a small sensor which seems to have produced a slightly OOF* image. Was the camera by chance on a tripod?OOF = Out Of FocusJAn
Art FaulThe Artist Formerly Known as Prints------Art for Cars: art4carz.comStills That Move: http://www.artfaul.comGreens: http://www.inkjetprince.comCamera Works - The Washington Post.
