On Jun 8, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Andrew Davidhazy wrote:
This photo raises the question in my mind: Is it true that if a photo has artistic value, it does not require a caption? In this case the caption makes it interesting, and I'd like to see more of the car.
A very interesting but often seen view of the viaduct.
One guess is that the poles mark the road when the road is not visible, due to darkness, or snow, or whatever. Another guess is they're markers to be left/right avoided in a stress test.
When I first saw this, I thought the dark region was a silhouette of a figure with arms raised. That would fit with the image of something shattered by it. Or, does "meditation" act as the counterpoint to a violent smashup? Anyway, interesting.
Again, the caption provides at least half of the interest. The visual part is nice, though.
To its parent, every baby is just beautiful, eh?
Can't really say why I like this. The complementary people in the foreground, with the leading lines toward the people at the end of the platform? Maybe. |
