Re: non-full RAW files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-10-22 22:31, Randy Little wrote:
but for a sports portaight or school portraight company that know they
won't every print bigger then 11x14 or 8x10 even its a lot of wasted
space and time saved in those types of industries.   I would never do it
and most people won't but event shooters doing 500+ shots a night might.

That kind of commercial environment is probably considerably more predictable than the kind of thing I think of first. And also results in higher volumes of pictures to handle, so the benefits of keeping each one smaller are bigger.

Others have also pointed out a benefit in burst size, too, which could be vital in some situations.

--
David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux