Re: IR conversion - Was: wannabe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: James Schenken <jds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ... The proportion of IR 
> light to visible light is quite variable and is strongly affected by time of 
> day.
> 

Interesting response, thank you!


Yes, definitely some heavy experimentation is in order. I just read that early in the morning there is more natural IR, so I am very affraid I will have to be on the field so early. ;)
 

> Sent from David's iPad

Say thanks to David!


> From: Andrew Davidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx>

> When they do the conversion they replace the camera's infrared blocking 
> filter with and infrared transmissive filter (but light blocking) and since the 
> CMOS or CCD sensors are infrared sensitive you can expect significant increases 
> in "speed".
> 

Basically, I am competing against myself - the filter gives me the IR, while the unmodified sensor in the camera tries to block it - I hadn't thought of this and it totally explains the steep compensation factor. It definitely turns the scale for me in favor of permanently modifying the digital body instead of buying a filter!

> James explained this also in his own words. So now you have two of us saying the 
> same thing in different words!!
> 

I now have two arguments of reason - I am rich!


****************

Alberto Tirado




[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux