On 1/30/12, asharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <asharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And folks wonder why some photographers take pictures of landscapes and > macro-botanicals. I've not often had a cactus ask me for a release form. > > Andrew > > > On Mon, January 30, 2012 1:52 am, Christopher Strevens wrote: >> But not police, psychiatrists, people, children, Harrods and other >> buildings that are "copyright", military officers, barracks, military >> vehicles, ships, aircraft. Or near airports, if fact it is quite difficult >> to take photographs in the UK without breaking the law, public parks have >> an anti-photography policy also, telephoto lenses are banned. And remember >> that photographing buildings that are homes could result in prosecution >> too. Rule: Always ask for written permission before pressing the shutter >> release button! >> >> Chris... >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan Mitchell >> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:29 AM >> To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students >> Subject: Re: PHOTOFORUM digest 5916 >> >> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Galen A Grimes" <gag5@xxxxxxx> >>> >>> >>> I'm planning a trip to London in April and I was wondering if anyone >>> can >> give me both 1) possible warnings about wandering around London snapping >> photos of everything I see, and 2) any suggestions on things to >> photograph outside of the usual (i.e., Buckingham Palace, etc.). >>> >> >> English law is quite clear - you can photo anything in a PUBLIC place, >> and images cannot be deleted without a Court Order. >> >> Dan. >> >> >> > >
