Re: no, everybody's not a photographer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: no, everybody's not a photographer
From: John Palcewski <palcewski@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:47:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <4E808EDB.1090008@chalkjockeys.com>
References: <5C70C801-6C89-43C6-A370-849A296E015D@leamurphy.com> <4E7FFBC4.7060003@herschelmair.com> <CAHvrzRWuMxfH++84npo5_YSKW_2-Ec1aY3-77UBWdiOPf2MP9Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E808EDB.1090008@chalkjockeys.com>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 9/26/11, Trevor Cunningham <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not sure, John, you might need to check the metadata on the image.

What a pity my museum-ready "Silver Gelatin Prints" do not contain
this information.

References:
- no, everybody's not a photographer
  - From: Lea Murphy
- Re: no, everybody's not a photographer
  - From: Herschel Mair
- Re: no, everybody's not a photographer
  - From: John Palcewski
- Re: no, everybody's not a photographer
  - From: Trevor Cunningham

Prev by Date: NEDCC Welcomes the 2011 Eastern European Photograph Conservation Intern
Next by Date: RE: no, everybody's not a photographer
Previous by thread: Re: no, everybody's not a photographer
Next by thread: RE: no, everybody's not a photographer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux