Lipstick on a pig, exactly. Of course, this brings to mind the Adams (paraphrased) quote: "There's nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept." Andrew On Tue, August 16, 2011 1:05 pm, mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Scott Kelby once said on a podcast the only two things you can't adjust > in Photoshop are ISO and bad photography. But being able to adjust does > not have to lead to sloppy technique. I think of Photoshop as make up > for a woman. A really pretty woman with a little make up that is > properly applied can be enhanced to look super model gorgeous. Put > makeup on Rin Tin Tin and you still have a dog. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: comments > From: PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx > Date: Tue, August 16, 2011 9:23 am > To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students > > > > > This is why I prefer full frame 35 mm over the half frames so I have more > room in my picture. > > Now I haven't tried to save an object by using the skew command I have > eliminated most of an object using the skew command . It was a 20mm lens > on a full frame camera at the Sarah Duke Garden Flower pond. the concrete > border intruded too much in the back of the picture so I made it smaller > with the skew command. > > > > > In a message dated 8/15/2011 9:29:26 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > Sure, unless something's on the edge that you don't want to lose. > > > Emily L. Ferguson > 508-563-6822 > > > www.landsedgephoto.com > > > > On Aug 15, 2011, at 9:16 AM, PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > > Forget the bubbles use Photoshop to make the world level. > > > Roy > > > > > >
