RE: "Super" macro...Andy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You should look at extension tubes. They will work with your current lenses,
and good extension tubes will work with your meter as well, although will
cost almost as much as a good macro lens.

Mark Lent

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Trevor Cunningham
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 10:01 AM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: "Super" macro...Andy?

  Sorry Andy, I worded my question poorly. This product is obviously an 
attachment of some sort. I was just wondering if you know of a product 
that does, effectively, the same thing, but at a greater level of 
intensity, almost like a microscope, that is easily portable in the field.

On 9/13/10 5:19 PM, ADavidhazy wrote:
> Trevor,
>
> I am not sure you meant this Andy but I don't know. The Russian lens 
> appears to be a "diopter" type close up attachment that fits in front 
> of regular lenses but it is not really clear in the ad.
>
> andy
>
> On Sep 13, 2010, at 3:27 AM, Trevor Cunningham wrote:
>
>>  After posting this, and pondering the idea that macro just doesn't go
>> micro enough, I did some digging and found this product:
>> http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/raynox-dcr-250-macrolens-nikon.htm
>>
>> Now that I think about it, Andy, is there a rather portable, more
>> microscopic, attachment/lens you could possibly use in the field?
>
>



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux