On Tue, August 10, 2010 08:38, Kim Mosley wrote: > I'm curious about the same question, but with the Nikon 1.8 vs. Nikon 1.4 > for the D90/D80. The 1.4 is 3 or 4 times as expensive. For both the Canon and the Nikon, the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 should not be overlooked, it sounds like. The reviews I've seen definitely place it ahead of the new Nikon 50/1.4 AF-S, and it's a lot cheaper than the Canon 50/1.2. (Me, I'm still using a Nikon 50/1.8 AIS from 1982; I used to have the 58mm f/1.2 NOCT, but sold that to finance the D700.) -- David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
