|
This is my take on the
"disturbance"..... I have limits. They are my limits in MY mind. I look briefly at the thumbnails of the submissions and went back to look more closely at those that catch my interest. I may or may not give the thumbnails a second look. Then I try to learn from the photos that caught my attention and from the comments of the list members. So I am limiting myself to those that interest me. I kooked closely at Mark's photo and was intrigued by the lace pattern. The same with individual posts of photos. I looked briefly at John's separate post, not in the gallery, and it isn't something that caught my interest. So I didn't look at it more closely or study it. What I'm trying to say is if you don't like it don't look at it. A quick glance usually tells you if you want to look more closely and study the image. It is not mandatory that we look closely or study each an every submission. We don't need, and I don't want, a censor on the group. A censor limits us to what he/she wants us to see. A censor limits creativity by not allowing us to see, and possibly explore, new ideas and new techniques. If people have problems with images like Mark's they better not go to an art museum where art from the 'old masters' show genitalia and nudity. Thats my $0.02 Bob --
/////
( O O )
--------------------oOOO-----O----OOOo-----73 de w8imo-------------
I plan to live forever. So far, so good......
|
