no doubt...untrained wolves keep their distance...i might be tricked
into believing it if the wolf were jumping away from the camera
John Palcewski wrote:
It's extraordinary that any committee of judges would actually believe
the photographer who claimed the image was made of a wild animal, on
the fly, AND at night. Absurd on its face.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:10 PM, <lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alberto,
The rules are clear - the picture looks too good to be true. Why did the
wolf jump the fence? It seems to me that it could have crawled through
with more stealth. A stunt wolf would be easy to recognize by its
owners. Remember when Disney got busted for their fake nature shows?
AZ
LOOKAROUND - Since 1978
Build a 120/35mm Lookaround!
The Lookaround E-Book
FREE COPY
http://www.panoramacamera.us
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [SPAM] Photographer stripped of title
From: Alberto Tirado <fotodiseno2003@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, January 21, 2010 1:25 pm
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Forum too quiet. I hope *not* to open a can of worms, but I found this news interesting:
Photographer José Luis RodrÃguez won the Veolia Environnement Wildlife Photographer of the Year award, but then the jury, after some investigations, ruled that the animal depicted was tamed/trained and thus the photo ineligible for the competition
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/01/21/wildlife.photographer.disqualified/index.html
The disqualification also means a permanent ban for the photographer.
Some are (I am!) very passionate about the subject of ""reality" in photography, but lets just keep this about the rules of the contest.
**********************
www.alberto-tirado.com
