It's extraordinary that any committee of judges would actually believe the photographer who claimed the image was made of a wild animal, on the fly, AND at night. Absurd on its face. On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:10 PM, <lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Alberto, > > The rules are clear - the picture looks too good to be true. Why did the > wolf jump the fence? It seems to me that it could have crawled through > with more stealth. A stunt wolf would be easy to recognize by its > owners. Remember when Disney got busted for their fake nature shows? > > AZ > > > LOOKAROUND - Since 1978 > Build a 120/35mm Lookaround! > The Lookaround E-Book > FREE COPY > http://www.panoramacamera.us > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [SPAM] Photographer stripped of title >> From: Alberto Tirado <fotodiseno2003@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Thu, January 21, 2010 1:25 pm >> To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students >> <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Forum too quiet. I hope *not* to open a can of worms, but I found this news interesting: >> Photographer José Luis Rodríguez won the Veolia Environnement Wildlife Photographer of the Year award, but then the jury, after some investigations, ruled that the animal depicted was tamed/trained and thus the photo ineligible for the competition >> http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/01/21/wildlife.photographer.disqualified/index.html >> The disqualification also means a permanent ban for the photographer. >> Some are (I am!) very passionate about the subject of ""reality" in photography, but lets just keep this about the rules of the contest. >> ********************** >> www.alberto-tirado.com > >
