OOOPS - Jack is right. It should be the late 20th century.
Marilyn
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Klasey" <jwklasey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: Shameless self-promotion but FYI
Andy:
"Late 20th Century" would have been a better choice and less subject to
misinterpretation (and accusations of premature aging).
Jack Klasey
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ADavidhazy
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 2:13 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: Shameless self-promotion but FYI
I was wondering about that ... does 1970 - 1999 count
as being late 1900s or am I confused - age you know.
and I REALLY would like to know ... did I make a
grammatical or other snafu with this statement?
help!
andy
wpettit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
"It is intended to be record of the work produced by Andrew Davidhazy in
the late 1900s."
Gee Andy, We had no idea you were that old.....
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: ADavidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Jun 29, 2009 1:10 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Shameless self-promotion but FYI
Published a vanity press, illustrated, Lulu book on the Phoenix Process.
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/fleeting-phoenix-figures/399430
6
Andy
