Andy: "Late 20th Century" would have been a better choice and less subject to misinterpretation (and accusations of premature aging). Jack Klasey -----Original Message----- From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ADavidhazy Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 2:13 PM To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students Subject: Re: Shameless self-promotion but FYI I was wondering about that ... does 1970 - 1999 count as being late 1900s or am I confused - age you know. and I REALLY would like to know ... did I make a grammatical or other snafu with this statement? help! andy wpettit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > "It is intended to be record of the work produced by Andrew Davidhazy in the late 1900s." > > Gee Andy, We had no idea you were that old..... > > > Bill > > -----Original Message----- > >>From: ADavidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx> >>Sent: Jun 29, 2009 1:10 PM >>To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>Subject: Shameless self-promotion but FYI >> >>Published a vanity press, illustrated, Lulu book on the Phoenix Process. >> >>http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/fleeting-phoenix-figures/399430 6 >> >>Andy >> > >
