Can I throw in my two cents for Tokina? I used a 28-70
mm f/2.8 for years and loved it. I sold 2 Nikon 35-70s because I
preferred the Tokina. I think they are built a little more ruggedly
than the Tamrons which I also like. I never had any use for Sigmas.
Every one I tried was either soft or the build quality was not up to
par. But that all is just my experience and is not necessarily
relevant to the current crop of lenses.
Don
Lea Murphy wrote:
Les,
Thank you for your input on this. I appreciate it.
I have a couple of non-Canon lenses. This Tamron is one I love so much
that I bought two of them because I like having an f/2.8 through the
zoom. It's light and small and I love that. Plus it's a good lens.
I will definitely look at the Canons you noted if I have to replace
this lens.
Again, thank you.
Lea
On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:45 AM, fotofx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Lea,
You probably just wore it out, it does happen. The Tamrons are built
much better than the Sigmas, but try and find a Canon 24-70 2.8L or the
24-105 f4L, both are mainstays in my kit and the 24/105 is great for
portraits. If you want a fixed FL the 85mm 1.4 cannot be beat. The
images quality and bokah are the very best that Canon has to offer and
will blow away anything else you have put in front of your camera. I
suggest renting from my friends at borrowlenses.com prior to your
purchase.
Yes the Canon lenses are more expensive than aftermarket glass. but I
have NEVER had one fail on a shoot. My 70-200 2.8 used to be a rental
prior to my owning it, it has been in 5g dives, vibrated against all
manner of machines and hit by an overthrown baseball at a Giants game,
still keeps on ticking.
Lots of folks may chime in about this or that Sigma or Tamron. I would
think that many doe not have cameras and w/ lenses that are over
250,000 frame shot under harsh conditions. Canon L series lenses are
just that much better. I sold Canon and the other stuff too. But the
real difference is the build quality and the images it helps you to
create. There is a real reason the aftermarket stuff is cheaper.
Cheers,
Les
-----Original Message-----
From: Lea Murphy
<lea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Jan 28, 2009 3:11 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: good lens gone bad?
Wow. Very helpful information.
Thank you so much.
Lea
On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Mark Blackwell wrote:
Ok Lea You have definitely identified
the source of the problem.
If the lens won't work on another body and another lens will work on
the body that had the problem, its definitely the lens. But there
are a couple of things to check.
First look real close at all the contacts and re clean them if
possible. Years ago I had one go funky and I cleaned the contacts
on the body, but not the lens. The gunk was on the lens contacts.
Check for damage to pins, but you likely have already done both.
Before I sent it back to the factory, Id check around for a local
repair man/person to take a look at it. IF there is anything that
they can do with it, its likely going to save you some down time.
Yes contacts could go bad. The grinding though to me sounds like it
might be something internal that has gone bad that is demanding more
voltage than the body expects. The camera sensing the need for
excess voltage suspects that something is in the way of the current
causing the clean contacts message. I don't know how easy it would
be to get to replace a motor or gears and hopefully it isn't that.
Yet the good local guy could likely tell you with just a listen, if
there is one near you and give you good sound advise on how to
proceed.
--- On Wed, 1/28/09, Lea Murphy <lea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Lea Murphy
<lea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: good lens gone bad?
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 11:53 AM
It's a Tamron.
I have two of the exact same lens...it's a 28-70mm
f/2.8.
I put the second one on and all is well.
The first one still won't work.
Lea
On Jan 28, 2009, at 11:46 AM, rebphoto wrote:
What brand of lens?
I had a Sigma lens that worked fine
for over a year with my 10d and
then decided not to talk with the camera
anymore. Kept giving the error 99.
I gave it to a friend.
He sent it to Sigma and for about $10.00
they did something so it would talk to his
Canon Rebel.
Russ
R.E. Baker
Photography
rebphoto@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.rebphoto.smugmug.com
Feed a Cat...
Starve a Fever........
----- Original Message -----
From: Lea Murphy
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals -
Students
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009
12:38 PM
Subject: good lens gone bad?
I have a dedicated 5D and lens in my studio. It never
leaves there and isn't used by anyone else.
Today when I used the camera for a
session it was
acting all funky, had a heck of a time making focus and was
kind of grinding around as if I were manually focusing with
the lens set in autofocus mode. I removed the lens, put it
on my 5DM2, it behaved the same way and the camera gave me
an error saying the contacts needed cleaning. I cleaned them
but the problem persists. Can a lens or lens contacts go
bad? It hasn't been dropped or used outside the studio
ever. Actually, it's never off the studio body. Any
ideas what in the world is going on here? Lea
babies. they're what i do.
www.leamurphy.com
babies. they're what i do.
www.leamurphy.com
babies. they're what i do.
www.leamurphy.com
Foto/SFX, San Jose, CA 408-835-1184
http://www.aviationphotographers.org/, http://www.fencecheck.com
http://www.myspace.com/fotosfx,
http://www.portfolios.com/profile.ht...=14627.baldwin
babies. they're what i do.
www.leamurphy.com
|
