RE: digital vs 4x5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Metamerism is very much improved on Epson with K3 inks (try to see some
Epson 4880 samples)
edwin

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of karl
shah-jenner
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 10:36 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: digital vs 4x5

dmoore wrote:

 
> > One thing we haven't discussed, in this digital vs 4x5 debate, is
> > conventional darkroom printing vs. scanning the negatives. One big  
> > advantage
> > I see in darkroom printing is no metamerism. I like to give my  
> > prints a
> > warmish tone and metamerism is a major issue when printing  
> > digitally, if I
> > display the prints under anything but tungsten light


Tim Halberg

> do you find this to be true as well if you have your digital files  
> printed through chemical processes?


if it were black and white then Dave's comments would still hold true.
but that's the digital inkjet/media combination V the silver paper
rather than digital V film


karl


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux