RE: Out-of-date equipment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: RE: Out-of-date equipment
From: Chris <cjrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:45:48 +0100
In-reply-to: <677e34620810150039m7d53a262h4f730d04165554d6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Home User
References: <923896.63089.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <677e34620810150039m7d53a262h4f730d04165554d6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Ackumdjcvewg/LCPQBekvy6C6i0CbwACGB+w

I recall when people ridiculed digital on this list and said it would never replace film. Now look what has happened.

Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Out-of-date equipment
  - From: karl shah-jenner
- RE: Out-of-date equipment
  - From: David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Out-of-date equipment
  - From: karl shah-jenner
- Re: Out-of-date equipment
  - From: Mario Pires

References:
- Re: Out-of-date equipment
  - From: Richard Martin
- Re: Out-of-date equipment
  - From: Mario Pires

Prev by Date: RE: Out-of-date equipment
Next by Date: Re: Out-of-date equipment
Previous by thread: Re: Out-of-date equipment
Next by thread: Re: Out-of-date equipment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux