I sold my 40-year old arca swiss 5x7 camera to help me pay for my nikon dslr...no regrets
i'm finding that i'm encouraged to take just as much time taking a good photograph with the digital so that i don't have to erase the volume of garbage that results from being trigger happy
"somewhere between zero and one...everything else is exaggeration" - Anonymous
i'm finding that i'm encouraged to take just as much time taking a good photograph with the digital so that i don't have to erase the volume of garbage that results from being trigger happy
----- Original Message ----
From: Laurenz Bobke <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 1:33:44 PM
Subject: Re: Ok so everyone seems to want lively debate (not flame wars)
From: Laurenz Bobke <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 1:33:44 PM
Subject: Re: Ok so everyone seems to want lively debate (not flame wars)
Mark,
the bait sure stinks ;-) but I'll take it.
Personally, I think the tool should be adequate for the subject. In a wide-angle shot of a landscape, I don't have to worry about straight lines but in architecture a shift lens might make sense...
Of course, many problems now can be corrected digitally lateron.
Some of the shots like most among my own photos were taken with really simple cameras.
Digital photography on the other hand is just more convenient for me - plus I don't have to find space for new slides anymore.
I somewhat doubt that there ever will be a time when it will become as "mature" as analogue. Think of computers: as soon as you buy a new one it's starting to get outdated.
I now have a quad core CPU. I'm pretty sure, three years from now I'll have to say: "I only have a quad-core" unless I have upgraded to the new standard by then...
Laurenz
2008/10/11 Mark Blackwell <mblackwell1958@xxxxxxxxx>
Ok I will throw out some stink bait. I am often amazed at how many people think that they MUST have the latest and greatest new equipment. They have great stuff but no idea of what to do with it. Others take junk and excel which begs the question, "Just how much of a part of the total success is the tool, and how much of it is the person running the tool?"
I use some old stuff. I have an old Voigtlander that was bought in the 50s that I still use. I have an old 4x5 view camera that is probably about that old. Both still work well, with some limitations.
Lenses are another long term investment. Do you upgrade every time a new lens appears? Who buys used lenses?? How used??? grin Zoom or primes??? Oh the choices.
Digital with its short life expectancy is a much tougher choice. It's not a mature industry, at least not yet but it seems to be getting closer. Not that long ago for what you would spend for a 5D you could get the D30 that was a 3.3 MP and the state of the art. Each new model does bring improvements, but when is the improvement enough to justify the new investment? It's not like the old one quits working. All tough decisions.
Its all part of the overall product. IF money is no object, you always get new stuff. Still that rarely is the case. So it brings us back to how much of a great photo is tool, and how much is between the ears of the person running it?
