Re: PF exhibit on April 12, 2008

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I know mine was one of the culprits at 800.  But it's interesting that you don't indicate one being that size.  Could the original size be lost in translation along the way?
 
"The optimist believes this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it's true" - J Robert Oppenheimer


----- Original Message ----
From: "PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx" <PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx>
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 9:29:57 AM
Subject: Re: PF exhibit on April 12, 2008

I checked the size of each one in Photoshop and found only three that were more than 700
(one at  900, one at  1000 and one at 864 pixels)
 
 
 
In a message dated 4/12/2008 8:45:37 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, cameratraveler@xxxxxxx writes:
Dear Gallery participants,

How difficult is it to follow the simple submission guidelines for 
the weekly gallery?  They call for a maximum dimension of 700 pixels 
on the longest side.  This week 5 out of the 8 submissions are larger 
than that.  This makes it irritating to view your pictures on my 
laptop.  Yes, I know you think your photographic submission is the 
greatest thing since pre-sliced cheese, so if you think it really 
deserves to be seen at a larger size please provide a link in your 
comments to your great masterpiece so we could view it in all its 
magnificence elsewhere if we so choose.

Thank you,

Rich
 




It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money & Finance.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux