Re: A more outrageous question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message ----- From: "Emily L. Ferguson" <elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:45 AM
Subject: Re: A more outrageous question


At 1:59 AM -0400 7/19/07, MichaelHughes7A@xxxxxxx wrote:
You can 'know' it is not a good thing to take a picture into the sun, and yet appreciate. or even take a 'contre jour shot' to highlight a blonde subject's hair.

Oh dear, another rule I routinely ignore!

(But the sails look so great when they're backlit!!!)

(That rule's been moot since they trained point&shoots to pop a little flash into the faces of backlit people.)

exceptions, exceptions.
--
Emily L. Ferguson
mailto:elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
508-563-6822
New England landscapes, wooden boats and races
http://www.landsedgephoto.com
http://e-and-s.instaproofs.com/


Exception: Ansel Adam's famous "Black Sun" over the Merced River. Exposed plus 3 times and developed normally, but expected a reversal process in camera, and got it. Gee. Knew what he was doing. That's the exception. Kind of pre visualizing solarization.


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux