Re: PhotoForum's SINGLE TREE exhibit installed!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I figured the gaps were there for a reason and I agree - they add interest to the image. I can't imagine me trying to stitch 15 exposures together. The image would be a crazy quilt, indeed {:->

Marilyn
***********************************************************************************
"Sometimes when we are generous in small, barely detectable ways it can change someone else's life forever." Margaret Cho ----- Original Message ----- From: "ADavidhazy" <andpph@xxxxxxx> To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: PhotoForum's SINGLE TREE exhibit installed!


Hi Marilyn,

I was essentially forced to do it because I had a short lens and an 800 mm in my car when I drove past that scene. With the short lens the tree was too small and with the 800 the tree did not fit in the frame. I remembered some discussion there was on the list about stitching and this got me thinking.

I was maybe 1/2 - 3/4 mile from the tree and as I "panned" the tree there did not seem to be much of a change in the features of the tree so I thought it would be interesting to see how the process of piecemeal capture and later assembly would work. I found I had to "pan" over three columns and five rows to cover the scene with the 800 mm lens.

I did all exposures from a tripod and at the same aperture and shutter speed ... once I realized that autoexposure would not work!

Then there were a couple of slivers missing as you can see. I thought they actually worked to confirm the process so was not too bothered by them. I do have a second sequence where there are no gaps but I worked with this one first. Doing the second set did not appeal to me!

When I mentioned that I had trouble with matching the sky tones someone mentioned a function in PS that corrects for this but am not sure it would have worked here. I am a novice with PS so did all the corrections "by hand". I think that one reason the fragments did not match exactly is that the in-camera software did not treat all the images the same as it compressed from RAW to high quality jpeg. But I don't know about this.

Andy


Marilyn Dalrymple wrote:

Hi Andy, Can you tell us, please, about the why and how you compiled 15 exposures? Marilyn




[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux