On May 3, 2007, at 8:31 AM, karl shah-jenner wrote:
Sadly it's not. Greenpeace has been forced to admit that it ignored some of its own information to reach its conclusions. Much of what they say is based on what companies are saying they are
ey will at some point say the will do, in the future rather than what they are actually doing now. It's rather like a waste disposal company saying "Yeah, we've been dumping noxious chemicals in the local river, but were going to stop in a few years" and being rewarded for it. Dave macaddicted |
