Re: Nikon Proud?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'd be happy with a 6x7 sensor -- this way RB67's, RZ67's, Fuji 680's, and  baby view cameras could continue to have a long and frutiful life.

J Michael Sullivan
Editor/Publisher, MAGNAchrom
www.magnachrom.com

MAGNAchrom -- The Alternative Journal of Medium and Large Format Photography








>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Dyer-Bennet [mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:34 AM
>To: 'List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students'
>Subject: Re: Nikon Proud?
>
>Alexander Georgiadis wrote:
>> This issue of sensor size, pixel count, pixel size,and their effects re:
>> noise and sensitivity got my little brain racing. What if.... someone
>> like Fuji built a full frame 4X5 digital back using the latest sensor
>> technology, but instead of cramming a zillion pixels, limited it to,
>> say, a reasonable 12 (HUGE)mega pixels? Would that not create not only
>> the "quietest" camera in the world but also the fastest (due to
>> incredibly high maximum ISO and the potential of an integrated
>> electronic "shutter")? In theory it should not cost much, as making
>> large pixels should be easier than tiny ones.Would this not hail the
>> return of the "press camera"?!
>
>It's not that hard, using integrated circuit fabrication techniques, to
>make things very small. What's hard is to make a single large item
>without fatal flaw; since flaws land pretty much at random on the die.
>
>Actually, 4x5 doesn't even fit on what I think of as integrated circuit
>dies; I dunno what they're using these days, though, the trend is always
>towards bigger pieces.
>--
>David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/dd-b
>Pics: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum,
>http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery
>Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
>
>
 


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux