Hi Alexander,
Not sure why but the version of your page which Google has in it Cached
Memory has the words "bloody photography" in it's source. You changed your
site much recently?
Hope this makes you feel better as Google not like'in your work would
suck(Yahoo would not be so bad, who cares what Yahoo thinks?)
Andrew Brooks
www.andrewbrooksphotography.com
From: Alexander Georgiadis <georgiadis@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Why does Google hate my photography page?
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:40:16 +0800
*
*
------------------------------
OK, get ready to hear the strangest thing. Ready? Here goes:
Like many of you that have websites, I subscribe to a site monitoring
service (statcounter in my case) which I check occasionally to see how many
visitors I am getting, what link they came from, which part of the world
etc. One of the reports statcounter supplies is called "recent keyword
activity". This tells me what words people typed into search engines like
Google or Yahoo to find my website. As I am a Canadian photographer working
in Shanghai, so I typically see "shanghai photographer" or "shanghai
portrait photographer" etc. as the search terms. No surprises. Until today.
This is so strange; someone had typed in the words "bloody photography"
into
Google search. A little weird right? It gets weirder! So naturally, I
replicated the search myself. Surprise! MY SITE IS AT THE TOP of the search
page if the quotation marks are included and no 5 of 1,360,000 pages if
they
are excluded.
OK now I'll wait while you try the search
yourself...............................finished? Cool right? It all might
make sense if I the word "bloody" actually appeared on my page. But it does
not. It never has. ------- Tres bizarre!
Everyone wants their page to appear high in google searches, but I never
expected my innocent child photography page to capture the number one slot
for "bloody photography". I don't know if I should be flattered or
insulted.
Why does Google hate my photography? The only reason I can come up with is
that Google has actually attained sentience or self awareness and is just
expressing its personal disdain for sentimental photography. Boy, I always
suspected that my photography might suck. But to be insulted by a
logarithm.... I feel utterly humiliated.
Can any of you venture an explanation for Google's behavior? *
*
__________________
*Proving that ugly people can take beautiful
photographs!*<http://georgiadis.googlepages.com/>
--
Alex Georgiadis
