Highly improbable: the body language, the eyes of the girls, her
hair, and the very cultural background of the individual is just TOO
coincidental. And remember that the photographer who placed the
figure in front of a speeding train would have to produce a viable
negative to match the one it was stolen from, even if the train-girl
was a so-called original digital image there are very sophisticated
ways to decipher if the figure was an original photograph or one
questionably appropriated from an original negative.
E. Lauritzen
On Jan 13, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Emily L. Ferguson wrote:
At 8:30 PM +0200 1/13/07, Pini Vollach wrote:
To my eyes the difference was only in the cropping.
Of course, that doesn't mean that the photographer was using some
one else's photo. It just means that more than one photographer
took that shot, possibly not even at the same time.
Similars happen all the time.
--
Emily L. Ferguson
mailto:elf@xxxxxxxx 508-563-6822
New England landscapes, wooden boats and races
http://www.vsu.cape.com/~elf/
http://e-and-s.instaproofs.com/
