the negative may be unaltered... but the scene might be... aka dorothea
lange... so what difference does it make to alter the scene pre or post
capture? as a photographer... one choose what one wants to photograph...
such a choice is a form of alteration...
From: Bob <w8imo@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A film vs digital question
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:48:48 -0500
Bob wrote:
When shooting photos documenting something is it better to use film, where
an unaltered negative can be shown vs a digital image that can be argued
that it was made to show what the shooter wanted by software?
Thanks,
Bob
Thanks for all the answers.
If the opportunity develops I may be glad that I kept my EOS-3.
Bob
--
/////
( O O )
--------------------oOOO-----O----OOOo-----73 de w8imo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Curiosity killed the cat although I was a suspect for a while........
_________________________________________________________________
Receive MSN Hotmail alerts over SMS!
http://en-asiasms.mobile.msn.com/ac.aspx?cid=1002
