Let me simplify I might give a student a bad grade for an image and he might say to me "That shot took me 4 hours to light and i had to climb up two stories of scaffolding to get the perspective etc...." That does bot change the image's impact at all. Most people don't see any more than that Tell a client that it will take 2 days to shoot and have another studio quote for half a day and see who gets the job. presuming equal talent. Economy of means is crucial. h --- Alberto Tirado <fotodiseno2003@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I tell my students never to judge a photograph by > > how much work went into > > making it. > > Hmmmm... But I do tell mine to appreciate "what" was > done, and most important, how the photographer tried > to convey a message. In commercial photography, "how > much work" can make a sale, thanks to hype. > > > > ... Some great > > images were shot simply. > ... > > Other ... > > forced through PS for hours and still turned out > > mediocre. > > But the reverse is also true. There's no causal > relationship here. > > > > Why should that change with knowledge of the > > process? > > > > If by "process" you mean "printing" or maybe > "retouching" (technical things), I tend to agree in > principle. However, I insist, a creative process > involves cultural background, narrative (elements in > interplay) and simple visual impact. > > I'm trying to balance on your comments, but I'm not > sure I get your point. > > Best regards, > > > ********************** > www.alberto-tirado.com > johnploy.blogspot.com > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Sponsored Link > > Don't quit your job - take classes online > www.Classesusa.com > > Herschel Mair Head of the Department of Photography, Higher College of Technology Muscat Sultanate of Oman Adobe Certified instructor + (986) 99899 673 www.herschelmair.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
