Re: blown highlights?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 09:16 PM 10/10/2006, Joseph Chamberlain, D.D.S. wrote:
Jeff and Lea:


Another important aspect of working with histograms is the fact that the
information displayed is not based on the RAW capture but rather on the JPEG
preview instead. Since JPEGs are limited to 8-bit (format limitation) while
RAW images are captured in 16-bit, it is very clear that a lot of the
information captured is not being displayed by the histogram.

Yes, and the histogram of a RAW file would be meaningless to anything but a RAW converter.


So while the histogram may be showing blown highlights, a lot of the
information that was clipped when the image was converted to JPEG to create
the preview is still there in the RAW file to be explored and manipulated.

There may or may not be information that was clipped. Depending on the scene, the jpeg can represent all the data that was there, albeit in a compressed way. However, the difference between a luminosity histogram and RGB channels histogram will always be significant. There is an interesting comparison on this page:

http://www.slrcamerainfo.com/article.php?filename=Dynamic-Range-and-Clipping



Jeff Spirer
Photos: http://www.spirer.com
One People: http://www.onepeople.com/


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux