Yea, but did you read all the discussion? Seems to me that carry-on is still the best. If I were on a business trip and absolutely had to have my equipment I would have a bullet-proof plan B. The ship-ahead method is probably smartest. How many bazillion packages get express mailed safely every day?
AZ
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: cameras in lugage
From: David Dyer-Bennet <dd-b@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, September 28, 2006 3:34 pm
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 9/27/06, lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I dunno, this might be a good idea:
>
> http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/09/expensive_camer.html
Heee. Yes, I consider it an elegant solution. Though since my travel
for the last 5 years has been almost entirely to New York and
California, it doesn't help me much (well, the *starter pistol*
version might, maybe; but I'd have to check the local laws very
carefully).
--
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
