rendering of slightly differing hues in blue skies between adjacent
images."
It helps to keep all the exposure settings manual, since the autoexposure adjusts to the different conditions in each shot. Of course, having the sun squarely behind you helps, too.
Renate
On 8/30/06, Roger Eichhorn <eichhorn@xxxxxx> wrote:
Nice, but no Mac version!
Roger
Roger Eichhorn
eichhorn@xxxxxx
On 30 Aug 2006, at 06:18, karl shah-jenner wrote:
>
> : i belive none is as easy & good as AutoPano Pro....
> : can anyone recify if this one is ???
>
>
> spotted elsewhere :
>
>> It seems a French company has licensed the autostitch algorithms
>> for use
>> in Autopano Pro. I've just started giving the demo a try. Seems to
>> have
>> lot's of features, but given what little time I've had driving it,
>> it's a
>> bit rough around the edges. Definitely a 1.x release
>
>
> ah, confirmed:
> http://www.autopano.net/faq
> "Autopano Pro is a commercial version of Autostitch using a licensed
> professional version of the SIFT algorithm "
>
>
> for ease though, autostitches method of pointing to a folder and
> clicking
> 'go' is hard to beat! ;)
>
>
> Autopano is probably better than autostitch even though it uses the
> same
> SIFT algorithm as they probably did more to the interface to make
> it easier
> for people to use.
>
>
> the algorithms in Hugin (enblend blender and nona stitcher) are
> different
> to autostitch/autopano pro but you can see the results and read a
> review
> here:
> http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/08/22/148209&tid=75
>
>
> looking again at this reviewers image I can see banding that
> autostitch and
> probably autopano eliminate better, but throwing messy images with
> lost of
> detail at it, hugin perfoprmed better in my first attempt at
> playing with
> it than autostitch..
>
> Again though, Hugin and Autostitch are both free for anyone who
> cares to
> download them so for students who might want to experiment with an
> image of
> two, autostitch or Hugin might suit them, and for intricate non-sky
> shots,
> hugin may outperform both autostitch and autopano .
>
>
> Of course, just like with sharpening algorithms, different algorithms
> perform better with different subjects.
>
>
> k
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
