Re: Film or Digital? The Eternal Question!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/28/06, PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx <PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx> wrote:



>In a message dated 8/27/2006 12:34:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
dd-b@xxxxxxxx writes:
>On the other hand, even properly stored film degrades noticeably
>within a human lifetime

Some do and some don't. I got stuff my father shoot in Fuji during WWII
which is in fine shape. Only have a dedicated 35mm scanner so I can't yet
scan them as they are about 3.25 x 4.25 inch transparencies. B&W stuff my
father shot is fine but some of the Ansco slide have faded into oblivion. I
guess Kodak was better back then. How slides were processed and by whom
makes a big difference to their longevity.

B&W silver-based images are certainly more durable than cromogenic
images (color slides, negs, or normal color prints).  There's still
the possibility of inadequate fixing or washing in B&W negs, though.

The big thing I wanted to point out is that ordinary modern color
materials are quite unstable in room-temperature storage, and older
ones were mostly worse.


--
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux