> OK then.. Lord Lichfield's passing didn't seem to stir anyone, maybe this Look Karl Lichfield is hardly worth a second though ... he certainly didn't count as a great photographer (heck, he didn't live in the right place) He took a few shots of some royals - so what? He only got to do that because of his title "Lord". So he wasn't a great photog.: he just had the opportunities that class and privilege brings. Bob