k,
Glad to see they saw fit to run the story.
I don't agree with your assessment of it as "plagiarized," however.
They credit AFP at the end of the story, and at the bottom of the page
have this statement: "This service may include material from Agence
France-Presse (AFP)..." It's a news service story which they paid for.
They certainly weren't timely in running the story, but it's not
plagiarism.
Rich
On Oct 25, 2005, at 9:45 PM, karl shah-jenner wrote:
I emailed our local media about those printer dots - seems they'd not
heard
about them before - here's the result of that email:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200510/s1490393.htm
..a plagiarized copy of the 'other' report.
nice to know *our* media is on the ball :-/
k
