Re: Bride vs Photographer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



IT shouldn't be if you still have the negatives.
Terry L. Mair
Mair's Photography
158 South 580 East
Midway, Utah 84049
435-654-3607
www.mairsphotography.com
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shyrell Melara" <shyrellmelara@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Bride vs Photographer



Copyright was mentioned but unfortunately I had failed to mark the first set of prints that went out. I know that copyright is always understood to belong to the photographer, but it must be harder to prove, isn't it? I mean without the print being marked?
Shyrell
----- Original Message -----
From: "karl shah-jenner" <shahjen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

pay, then take her to court for breach of copyright! :-)

the copyright breach (copying) WAS mentioned in court, yes?

k



Shyrell Melara

For the Quality You Deserve!
Melara Family Photography
http://shyrellmelara.tripod.com

--
_______________________________________________
NEW! Lycos Dating Search. The only place to search multiple dating sites at once.
http://datingsearch.lycos.com






[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux