Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIV
From: Peeter Vissak <pv@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 10:30:33 +0300
In-reply-to: <4870f07a050505131229a354a3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2931706.1115278392798.JavaMail.www@wwinf3102> <2e3b160e506e34b744dd9d634b50978c@maggielucas.ca> <001a01c551a0$2e588ea0$b5184754@oemcomputer> <7267ad70f20aab552a601381e2db7bdb@maggielucas.ca> <4870f07a050505131229a354a3@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

Whatever lens is superior, but Nikon is better than Canon!!!

;)

Peeter,
who has never touched any Canon

Follow-Ups:
- Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIV
  - From: Terry

References:
- Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartII
  - From: Qkano
- Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIII
  - From: margaret lucas
- Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIII
  - From: Bob Talbot
- Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIV
  - From: margaret lucas
- Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIV
  - From: Achal Pashine

Prev by Date: Re: Bride vs Photographer
Next by Date: Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIV
Previous by thread: Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIV
Next by thread: Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIV
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux