Re: F1.8 versus F1.4 PartIII

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



bom dia

it's simple to hear the question behind the question for heaven's sake, there's no need to flail on someone if idiomatic use of phrase come from someone whose first language may not be english. this is international list. teh intraweb is for everyone.

meu prazer,
maggie
On May 5, 2005, at 4:33 AM, Qkano wrote:




I was expecting facts! it was a direct question(50 mm F1.8 vs 50mm F1.4)!

there are lens better than others- that's a Fact!

there are realitties that are comparable- that's also a Fact!


A good lesson in how to make people angry!

Both of your so called facts are only so in your own mind.#
Seriously, if you can't see that I'm not sure there's much hope for you.


Before you can decide which of something is "best" you need to decide on what criteria you are to judge them. It's not just photography, it's cars, holidays, computers, well, just about anything.

For lenses, testers try to set objective criteria, sharpness at centre, sharpness at edge, colour, contrast, distortion. All sorts of other things affect real-world decisions: weight, cost, reliability, build, feel, control of internal reflections ...

... and you want to know "Which is best?"  . Period?


OK, which is best, a Ferrari or an SUV? - Answer 1) A mother with a big family to run to skool - Answer 2) A short balding middle-aged businessman ;o)

It depends is the answer.

Bob









--

Whatever you Wanadoo:
http://www.wanadoo.co.uk/time/

This email has been checked for most known viruses - find out more at: http://www.wanadoo.co.uk/help/id/7098.htm



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux