sorry bob, i apologise to you, and to the list, for my churlish
remarks. it just seemed to me that instead of jumping on a questioner
for phraseology, it would be so much nicer to have a little convo, a
little subjective this and that re: each lens, maybe a little factoid
here and there, instead of *seeming* to want to cut convo off at the
pass, which is how it *appeared* to me. as it happened, opinions were
expressed pro & con re: each lens. so all's well that ends well.
abjectly,
maggie
scots wha hae
On May 5, 2005, at 3:24 PM, Bob Talbot wrote:
it's simple to hear the question behind the question for heaven's
sake,
maggie
It might be simple to you, but to me it's well hidden.
Riu has both lenses: he wants to know which is best.
How can we answer.
What was so wrong with suggesting he took the same shot with both and
compared them?
Surely, if it works it works *whatever* any lens tests say.
His reply indicated he had completely dissed the suggestions. That's
not very polite either.
Bob
mercansu i tobano
