RE: Film Vs. Digital

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ICD Image Capture Device.  Can be used for film or electronic image capture.
"Digital" is a name that has caught on, originally for its supposed fidelity
and reproducibility.

The first electronic cameras were those based on television and the recorded
on to an analogue tape.  These cameras were very expensive and extremely low
quality.

Now things have improved.  And I'm shredding all those film based holiday
snaps.....

Now how do I shred CD's?

Chris.

:> -----Original Message-----
:> From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
:> photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Talbot
:> Sent: 11 April 2005 21:01
:> To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
:> Subject: Re: Film Vs. Digital
:> 
:> > Polaroid dropped Vectograph film and sold their polarizer division,
:> so I am mad at Polaroid these days. To answer your question, I think
:> not. We are really grabbing at straws. It would be a digital/film
:> hybrid. And quite silly.
:> 
:> > Bob (the other one)
:> 
:> Sorry,
:> 
:> You mean it's silly to call any analogue/digital hybrid "digital".
:> 
:> Thanks for agreeing.  ;o)
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> It might read as silly to you but in a sense that's because people
:> prefer black boxes to remain that way.  Once you start understanding
:> what goes on inside things start to diverge from the
:> "conceptware"advertising.
:> 
:> So does it really matter if "digital" sensors are actually analogue
:> all along - really we mean they are electronic devices.  But since
:> digital photography is "better in every way than film" why is it
:> people often say to me "that's nice, is it digital" about my prints.
:> If it's so much better why can't they tell they were taken on film?
:> 
:> 
:> bob
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> 



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux