On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:39:44 -0600, Don Roberts <droberts@xxxxxxxx> wrote/replied to: >Uh, Jim, the Seggerman site says the images are made without the aid >of a "camera lens". Nothing there to indicate she doesn't know a >scanner has a lens. I don't see a problem with the lack of >information about the machinery used but that's just me. The >Kauffman site says very plainly that they were done with a flatbed >scanner. Uh, ya, no 'camera' lens but where do you define camera and scanner difference. I've seen digital scanning backs on 'cameras'. So the lenses are lenses and I see no point where one is not the other. My point was that the question posed at first is unanswered. It appears that the 'artist' doesn't know the answer. It would not surprise me if the 'artist' doesn't know that she is actually using a lens that in fact is very much like a camera lens. -- Jim Davis, Nature Photography, http://easternbeaver.com/ Motorcycle Relay Kits
