RE: Chris's computer graphic

To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Chris's computer graphic
From: ADavidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:56:50 -0500 (EST)
Cc: andpph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:30:21 +0100" <00bd01c5138c$68c976f0$6400a8c0@LAPPI>
References: <20050215042721.59861.qmail@web30307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Just a thought - should images that have no connection 
to reality be shown in our photography gallery? 

andy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chris's computer graphic
  - From: Guy Glorieux
- Re: Chris's computer graphic
  - From: David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Chris's computer graphic
  - From: Rich Mason
- Re: Chris's computer graphic
  - From: Bob Talbot
- Re: Chris's computer graphic
  - From: Bob Talbot
- RE: Chris's computer graphic
  - From: Jeff Spirer
- RE: Chris's computer graphic
  - From: Chris
- Re: Chris's computer graphic
  - From: Terry
- Re: Chris's computer graphic
  - From: Curtis Fant

References:
- Re: Laurenz's pic
  - From: trevor cunningham
- Re: Laurenz's pic
  - From: Laurenz