Terry M
----- Original Message ----- From: "SteveS" <sgshiya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: Digital ISO; lens optimization)
The digital 'film plane' or exposure chip is flat, the normal film lens sends a cone shaped beam of light to the back, or film plane. Digital lenses are ground so the 'beam of light' is sort of like a rolling pin, or straight back at perpendicular angles to the capture-chip. (or whatever it's called)
I spent a few hours talking to a lens designer at the gallery where I once worked. Yeah. They're different.
Or, the camera manufacturers have shaped the light capture surface to compensate for their film lenses.
S.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Fraser" <fraserg@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 11:22 AM
Subject: RE: Digital ISO (actually now lens flare and optimization)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eclipse Agency"
: What about lens flare and such? The article gave a few reasons how digital : lenses are optimized.
When I first heard of so called 'Digital' lenses I said 'yeah right'. But
the thing that caught my mind as being a possibility was not so much flare
from outside light sources per se but rather the light reflecting off the
sensor and back towards the lens and then reflecting back into the sensor
etc. Supposedly the digital lenses have more anti-reflective coating to
prevent that. I'm no expert like Vlad, but that sounded plausible to me.
Greg
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.4 - Release Date: 1/25/2005