Hi Shyrell, I've sent a quickly touched up version of badshot 3. It looks like they can be improved by scanning and digitally improved. I sent them to both the e-mail addresses I have for you on file. BTW the films look underexposed. Some films do have marks like that when unexposed. I've seen it on my fuji films when I've underexposed. Scanners also make scans like that if they are cheap, domestic scanners. A Nikon scanner would not do that but an Epson flatbed might. -----Original Message----- From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of shy_mel_photo@xxxxxxxx Sent: 27 November 2004 20:24 To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students Subject: Re: HELP! Thanks, Chris, I had some of these ideas, too. If things don't get any better I'll let them know what happened and offer a free deal for new studio pictures. Hopefully I'll get my negs fixed by the company and get new prints. I'll keep you all posted. Thanks. http://shyrellmelara.tripod.com/id7.html An explanation is included on this page. Shyrell On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:54:59 +0000 Chris <nimbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I humbly suggest you apologise to the couple and ask them to > partially > re-run the wedding so that critical photographs could be re-taken. > > For future reference, take out professional photographic liability > insurance > so that the re-run's expenses would be covered. > > Find a pro-lab that all your fellow professional photographers > around your > town use. I suggest to find this you ask the local photo-school. > > It is important that you don't disappoint the couple otherwise your > reputation (!) will follow you. > > There is a possibility that digital processing could remove the > mark, in > this case I suggest you send to a pro-digital lab where they touch > up > photos. > > Failing everything scan your critical prints and e-mail them to me > (10"x8" > 250 dpi jpeg) and I will attempt to do something digitally. No > guarantee of > success but I won't charge either. > > Chris. > nimbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > shy_mel_photo@xxxxxxxx > Sent: 27 November 2004 16:40 > To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students > Subject: HELP! > > Need help! The wedding pictures I took a few weeks ago came back > with > tiny blue streaks across each and every photo! All I got was a > letter of > apology and a new roll of film from the processor! This means I > will > loose all the money I might have made on the sale. I'm sick to my > stomach! > > My questions are: > What have all of you who have experienced this (or similar) done to > fix > the problem? > What have you said to the customer and what other options did you > offer? > Is there any way to mask or minimize these lines so they are > invisible? > What other things can be done now and to prevent this in the > future? > (Yes, I will change companies!) > For those who do not develop their own photos, who is your > processor? > > Please don't tell me I should have used digital. At this point that > comment would be redundant. I'm still waiting to purchase my camera. > I do > have an old 3.0 PS but still trying to learn how to use it. I have > aprox. > 4 weeks to fix this problem before I call the Bride. > > ALL comments and help needed! > > Thanks you guys. : o ) > > Shyrell > > > > >
