well... just because you are Kuckoo don't mean you could not have spoofed the other address, just to 'prove' your sanity... oohh... anyway to bring this thing back on topic... I shot my second wedding (as a second-photographer) last weekend... :) I don't know where this photography thing is leading to, but I am sure taking the scenic route.... I shot with a D70 and my aging SB-24 Speedlight on Auto (since the D70 doesn't play with the SB-24 on TTL)... I must say after the manual lights in the studio and auto-everything TTL flash, Auto-sensor does make you think a little bit... I think. Best regards, Deen -- Deen Hameed deenhameed@xxxxxxxxxxxx 0405 649 101 2004-08-23 13:35:17 At 2004-08-23, 09:47:07 karl shah-jenner (shahjen@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Deen Hameed" <deenhameed@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" ><photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 5:27 AM >Subject: Re: Nice HOAX Re: Digital lens question > > >> Now I'm all confused... same originating address... careful dissection of >the headers and all... >> what is want to know is... > >same ISP, different mailer, different address of origin etc.. > >a mystery, no? > >;-) > > ___ END OF QUOTED TEXT ___
