Philip Wayner <pwdloge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > There seems to be a feeling that one must give up the use of film if > digital is used. This might be true if only small fixed back cameras > are used. But as long as there is a need for the corrections > possible with the larger view camera, film will be used, at least > until a digital back is a practical monetary investment. Actually, one of the reasons I've done so little with my 4x5 lately is that it's so easy to do perspective correction in photoshop. At this point I'm fixing the perspective in my *snapshots* if I happen to notice a problem! > There is also another possibility, the use of both film and digital. Yes. I've shot almost a roll of film a month so far this year (mostly at one event), along with a *lot* of digital. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/> Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
