Re: Where is the original? Was: RE: Value of the Original; Guidelines for pricing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



wildimages@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> And no again -- two monitors properly calibrated with a hardware
> color-sensor are probably more alike that the first and last print
> from a stone lithograph print run,
>
> Hahahah ... yea, right David.  In an ideal world ....
>
> The fact remains that today, *now* most (all but a vanishingly
> small) minority of monitors are nor "properly" calibrated.
>
> I've noted now you were sticking to a tiny, tiny subset of all
> digital images (that is, those which are considered art AND are
> printed to hardcopy).

Sorry if I've narrowed the field; I understood the discussion to be
about "art" from the beginning.

> But where is the original for them?
>
> The print?  Well, we know they fade faster than oil paints of silver
> prints of old?

I'm guessing this was intended to say "OR silver prints of old"?
Responding as if that was the intention, anyway.

Actually, inkjet color prints may outlast silver-gelatine B&W prints.
They certainly outlast chromogenic color prints.  They may well
outlast dye-transfer prints. 

> The digital file?  Well, the sequence of bytes is not the whole image.
> The RGB values alone we all know don't tell the whole picture.  Add on the
> profiles (and the inextricably linked hardware) and the calibration hardware
> [if the definition of "properly calibrating" a monitor changes what then
> the file?].
>
> Will today's standards stand still, be supported backwardly?  When all images
> are saved in 16-bit per channel (or even HDR) formats and the original has
> been translated ... there may not be 1:1 bit correspondance.  I'm sure the
> differences would be tiny but the "original" set of bytes may not be usable
> in 20y time without translation? ???

Unlikely, if you save in a sensible format.  TIFF has been around for
20 years already, it'll be around far more than another 20.  

> I reckon the best idea is to destroy the digital file and let the single
> copy of the print become the de facto original, saves worrying ...

That would certainly simplify things!
-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux