Sounds interesting. I'm teaching a workshop this summer at the Photographers' Formulary all about that. I'm interested to know your results. It sounds like you have some cut film, right? Expose four pieces -- two on the exact reading, one two stops under and one two stops over . . . develop the first normal exposure normally and proceed according to those results. Should be fun. Personally, I don't know what the big deal over Plus X revival is all about. When TriX came out, it was simply better. Pan X . . . good film. The thing about the older films is there are no accelerators in the emulsion, so you can manipulate it with developer and to prevent fog . . . well, the PF has a product: Shap's Bal. Bitz that will cure that. :) Steve Shapiro, Carmel, CA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory Fraser" <Gregory.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 6:58 AM Subject: RE: Pemission for posting quotes > > <<ts just beneath a picture of Britney Spears riding Harry > > Potter's broom. >> > > Greg > > > > Is that what you meant by her "pleather phase" (sic, your > > website) or was that part written by Vlad? > > > > Bob > > Vlad suffers under a self-imposed illiteracy. He found that reading safety warnings and owner's manuals impeded his creativity. He dictated it and I typed it up and edited out the foul language. > > BTW I have had enough pre-orders on the napkins to order another run of 100,000 printed up. > > To bring this post on topic a bit - I have a roll of Kodak Pan-x I intend to shoot that expired back in 1975. Is 29 years too long to expect much from the film? Actually as long as it produces an image at all, I'll be happy. I opened the box today and the foil wrapper was intact as was the cardboard sleeve inside the wrapper. > > Greg Fraser > Slapper of Newts > "Things are never what they seem" - Vlad > http://users.imag.net/~lon2251/Gallery > > >
