Bob Talbot <BobTalbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I think it would be easier to critique the gallery's photographs if >> a little more information was given with the images. > My take is sligtly different. > > If an image needs an explantion (or even a title for that matter) then > its already failed on one level. I think this depends on the *type* of shot. Some kinds of photojournalism, and many kinds of technical recording, don't speak for themselves. That's a requirement for *art* shots, but I hadn't understood the gallery to be limited to that type of photography. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/> Photos: <dd-b.lighthunters.net> Snapshots: <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
